/lit/ - Literature

>mfw reading Aristotle's meta physics

This stuff almost seems basic, just by the vague posting of other metaphysical work posted on /lit/ it seems that I can comprehend greater ideas.

>>11700199

>>11681900
The path is narrow

Do I need the 'to'?

For example

> I'm starting to be become more religious and I feel sin is much harsher than I used, so now I'm playing tug-a-war with my religious thoughts.

When the 'to' is heavily implied in the mind of the reader? Even without the reader using 'used to' in their head.

How to master the art of argumentation without sophism?

>>10668709
>>10668714
I don't care if you believe me or not.
But I understand the form of the trinity and how it the aspects are all related to each other.

I'm not looking for just the trinity as God, Son, Spirit, but the other forms it also presents its self as.

The self defined in my own words; It is I the believer the one who is the self deceiver, what I see is what is believed, the experience is like climbinh a tree.

I; is self defined, if you believe that the self does not exist, it does not.

I relies on subjectivity until the point of value becomes so vague and undefine-able it becomes fact of objectivity.

Delusion - deluded sight (objective truth)

Illusion - subjective thoughts blocking reality.

Reality - the point between all thoughts, were the I expands from

>>10446681
Yeah, I do.
I have no script, you keep impyling I disagree with. You keep calling me a shill so you can create a false narrative of my being.

Anon, you just took off your trip so you could post without your name.
And that implies much more.

Stop projecting.

Here is a trinity for a succesful life anon.


Status, Family, Health.

Use pic related to understand the above statement.