/lit/ - Literature

>>12645785
Yes, thank you, now I understand, but which of what you are talking about is barely conceivable, let alone think that there are any authors that achieved this state, even less were able to express it, and even there, why scrutinize the hieroglyph of a schizophrenic. That would be counter productive, especially when going along with your philosophy.
In reality, I'd rather skip the spiteful projections of a man corrupted by ugliness because it would simply be a waste of time for me. Not that you cannot learn, from an ugly man, just that there is less to learn, again, if I speak for myself.
>>12645872
Quebecer
>>12645880
I find most classical author to be beautiful, but back then most people had better face because of the environment. Most people aren't objectively beautiful. The thing is that today, lifestyle is such in a way that people grow really poor faces, develop malocclusion, get teeth pulled out for orthodontics treatments that relapses and all those things destroys a face.
It's worse in America than Europe, mostly because of the sugar heavy soft diet there.