/lit/ - Literature

I made attempts at a psychoanalytic theory of the dickpill (branch of blackpill pertaining to penis size). Let me know what you think of it.
To be brief the whole theory revolves around the basic Freudian observation that the aspect of femininity - the vagina - is hidden whereas the aspect of masculinity - the phallus - is visible and present. The phallus thus represents something positive whereas the vagina can only be understood negatively as a negation of the phallus. Equipped with these preliminary remarks we can understand why male sexual parts are held to higher standards than female sexual parts or in other words why you'll never see a woman plunge herself into a depression because her vagina is "too small" or "too tight". Since vagina represents something negative it follows that it's not subject to gradation or to put it another way since vagina is associated with hiddeness something cannot be more hidden than it actually is for hiddeness is an absolute category. Conversely the phallus stands for what is positive and therefore exists on a graded scale. What follows is that you are a woman by virtue of simply having a vagina but you're not properly speaking a man unless your member is of a sufficient size. Things get a little complicated when we remind ourselves that there are negative numbers but negative numbers do not exists geometrically. The Greeks had no conception of negative numbers. They are useful tools for mathematical physics but nothing beyond that. Thus femininity geometrically conceived doesn't exist in other way than as a negation of masculinity.