/lit/ - Literature

>>6835876
>brother
You sound like a clergy man. How low will you stoop?

>>6745663
>Do the two differing parts of an oxomoron enhance each other?

>>6676691
What is 'what'?

>>6669743
Having read a fair share of his books I diagnose him with an inferiority complex with regards to masculinity. The latter that is: Group 3. He'd fit there but honestly he deserves his own group.

>>6669768
Nothing like that at all. Social conditioning. Woman are trained to react to others, this breeds sensitivity. I'm speaking generally of coarse. You get non-sensitive women too of coarse, lots of them. You get this in men too, but not so much of it. If I could speak in broad terms I would people are divided into the dominant and submissive. The dominant assets; the submissive reacts. To react a lot you adapt to its needs, sensitivity is a valued trait towards that skill. Now why I say women are mostly sensitive (or especially in contrast to men) is because of historic sexual identity placed onto them, also because of physical inferiority in regards to muscles and mass, these things act on them without them knowing or forces them into such a role.