/lit/ - Literature

>>15088347
Just substitute "god" for "the big bang".

>Motion necessitates a first mover
The big bang.
>Cause and effect necessitate a first cause
The big bang.
>Blablabla contingency, non contingent
The big bang.
>Blablabla perfection
This argument is fucking stupid, but if you really need you could claim the big bang holds all the potential for all the perfect things to exist, so it's the most perfect. (This is still stupid, however).
>Intelligent designer.
Hehehehehe. Again, dumb as fuck but if you must go with this, just imagine the big bang as containing all the sets of rules and instructions, for absolutely no reason. That's it.

"BUT WHO CREATED THE BIG BANG?"
Now just go the other way around. Substitute "the big bang" back for "god". You will start seeing how dumb you "cosmological theologians" sound.