/lit/ - Literature

>>2904226
>>2904241
Oh well that wasn't OP's aim anyway. Once you have the books, why NOT read them? I often find a stash of very random or obscure books, and it's a real pleasure to graze through them in no particular order.
(My last find was a box full of French novels from the 1920s. It had classics (Zola), abridged versions, and some popular fiction. It reminded me of a treasure chest, because it was mainly its discovery and the mixed content that made it interesting.)

>>2904174
Since King is such a prolific writer, I imagine that restricting oneself to a decade might be handy. This way, you'll have less trouble with discrepancies in setting (most of his stories have contemporary settings).

>>2883196
This is Jack. Lovely style of argumentation. First you give a useless, though humourous simile, and then you try to inb4 anyone who disagrees. Are you 'trolling' us, sir?