/lit/ - Literature

>lose an argument
>say 'sorry, I was wrong'

>>14297286
>How so? Left wing politics centers itself on things like intergenerational handicaps and shame

Not really. If thought about in terms of game balance, leftists want all options (race, faith, sexuality, starting money, ending money, healthcare access, etc.) to be equal, with buffs and nerfs to make that happen as needed. Rightists want the meta to find its own level without interference, letting people do their own thing and seeing who rises and falls based on it.

Leftists are up their own ass because they want to claim there won't be winners and losers in rebalancing, and act like you can make things perfectly fair and 100% balanced without squishing everything together into a kinda "meh" blob of unexciting mediocrity.

Rightists are up their own ass because the current meta makes being a straight, white, heterosexual male an overpowered strat and them trying to claim that they "want the meta to find level" is in no small part a cover for "I know my curren't strat's OP in the meta, but I don't care if it's unfair, I enjoy being OP", especially because whenever the meta actually DOES naturally shift, they're first freak out that the rules need to change to halt that.