/lit/ - Literature

>>16361306
>implying it'll get banned
>implying this 'outrage' won't blow over in 2 weeks tops
So far I think the only time your book can get banned is if you really fuck with religious organisation.

I am a fool, so do not mind my claims.

When such a considerably complex foundation that we know as digital communication is brought out, we experience effects and aftershocks that are quite irregular. For instance, the degree of personal considerations, of those who bear certain wrongs brought against them, are now directly tied to the structure of political dialogue. This should be entirely expected, as the perceiver who loosely brings himself to the research of ideology is met with an array of identities, all of which share different levels of sophistication (in my opinion, the large extent of these individuals are of a lower quality). As OP's picture outlines the inevitably personal realm of thought that is tied to contemporary political conditions, though the term "conditions" is slightly inaccurate, as the problems in front of us affect and influence nothing of importance, we can now understand the consequences from the digital medium: a stagnant situation of ultrasociality without any direct intervention from higher or lower classes; citizens chasing a carrot on a stick, except there has never been a carrot or a stick.


If you are able to imagine the analysis of Adorno and other Frankfurt types of psychic life under capitalism, then you can likewise consider this as its direct extension --- systems of thought or rational development perverted through the pervasive web of influences that stunts the growth of political practice. Through the interjections of those who are neither willful enough to introduce the ends of political change, nor knowledgeable enough to influence others to act in this vein, the thoughtful and rigorous development of ideologies that have traditionally grown in history are now reduced to instantaneous sensations of what is deemed morally wrong, and never built into a cohesive form beyond those opinions.

Welcome to catatonia.

>>14186070
fucking end yourself. posthaste.

>>13987142
>wahh muh biguhtwee
Do you know where the fuck you are?

>>13011630
>muh soggy knees

>>11970958

>>11546314
>literary value is determined by how much money it makes
it works both ways, why are you making me greentext you again

>>10924970
this should be published desu

>>10906534
>make surface level observations of an author's style
>thinking you're contributing anything to the discussion

>>10596435

>>10571605
>haha I said something ironic in response to your serious question :)
>uh no I don't actually know anything about the topic at hand

/lit/: The Shitpost

>>10487059
Kekd

>>10456029
>Looks like a child
That's a prerequisite for most of the posters here. Where do you think you are?

DUDE ACID LMAO

Seriously though he's shit. Just another pretentious 60's psychedelic babbler with nothing of any actual substance to say. Back then all you had to do was just come off as artsy and people would think you were speaking new gospel. Go back and listen to almost anything from the late 60's and see what I mean. The whole scene was just an excuse to get high and chill with the cool kids.

>>7794243
10 seconds after my post submitted I knew I was going to get this reply

>>7472884
>pseudointellectual
>not just entry level intellectual
You are probably a shitty bf with this condescending bullshit. Women with a modicum of decency are hard to find, let alone one with interests beyond shopping.