/lit/ - Literature

>>17920014
Here you go.

>>17539864

>>17413131
I suppose by "thought of" I mean thought of in posterity, by objective critics, whose role it is in society to select, preserve and extol great art. I would rather be critically well-received but commercially unsuccessful than vice versa. Wouldn't you?

>>17413158
I managed to dig this excerpt up from a scrapped short story. It was scrapped for a reason - this isn't even formatted - but it's of reasonable enough quality that I think you can imagine a longer, more polished piece (without repeating the word 'campus' so soon, for an example) could feasibly be publishable. I'm not bullshitting, anon, and I don't know why you'd think I was.

>>17413168
I'm not on social media, I write I cover letter as "I am a lecturer in X at X in the United Kingdom. My writing has previously appeared in X, X, X and X. I am currently working on my first novel, forthcoming with X."