/lit/ - Literature

>>9066875
Marks' main fuck up was putting an evangelical spin on his otherwise very sound and highly compelling philosophy of history.

By Capital’s own argument and the nature of the material dialectic, communism isn't something for which one advocates or seeks to "immanatize," it is a proposed inevitability--the natural sequence in the capitalization and abstraction of human labor as it expresses itself though a social order.

Mao and Che and the long line of apostles and heresiarchs were nothing more than religious leaders, just the promise of the return to the prelapsarian state in a different guise.

By Capitals own argument and the nature of the material dialectic communism isn't something for which one advocates or "immanatizes," it is a proposed inevitability--the natural sequence in the capitalization and abstraction of human labor.