/lit/ - Literature

>ay bruh like boohoo clown ass nigga maybe get some bitches on ya dick nigga

hat man mich verstanden?

why'd he go crazy?
>hardmode: no syphilis

>>19983209
>narcissistic old woman that had done nothing but sabotage other her whole life
>scammer prey on less fortunate people
>mentally ill that cook and eat children
No pure evil? absolute bullshit.
>but muh situation
Yes, I already know. You have no choice, and I will stop you. May your god give you salvation

>>19943083
Life must be aesthetically justified

>>19037419
>we

>>18679311
Evil is much better than whatever slaves think is "good" .

HAT MAN MICH VERSTANDEN?

>>17550305
>Nietzsche is a nihilist
>Nihilism stands at the door. Whence comes this uncanniest of all guests?
>hey the old values are dead we need to overcome them and create new values for ourselves if we want to beat nihilism

What is it with the brainlet takes on Nietzsche on lit these days?

Where did this bullshit that good people deserve good things and bad people deserve bad things come from?

Nobody "deserves" anything. Some people get good fortune and some people get bad fortune. There's no rhyme or reason to it.

anyone have the Nietzsch quote where he wants to kill anti semites?

there should be a test you have to take before speaking about Nietzsche.
How is such a famous figure so constantly and wildly misunderstood? Every thread on here about him is full of people who either never read him or completely misread him. And I don't mean that they are confused on small details or reach the wrong conclusions for complex concepts, I mean a fundamental misunderstanding what he believed in and even what he was writing about.
This is from both supposed fans and detractors.
Core issues that breed false claims:
>N was a nihilist
This is an obvious one, but those arguing against it also state things contrary to what he wrote, ie "N wasn't a nihilist, he believed all meaning is objective". N believed the meaning of life is to live, hence his constant repetition that morality must be life-affirming. This is a foundation for his philosophy, he never outright says it but it is implicit in his every argument.
>N was a fascist/communist
He was a monarchist and he certainly would never have been a fan of fascism because he did not believe in punishment. He said that a society's strength is measured by how many criminals it can endure. This is a massive portion of BGE, in which he lists off all the supposed utilities of punishment, refuting them and stating that any tool with so many uses that run contrary to each other is not a precise or effective tool. Fascism cannot exist without the strict enforcement of law, and this law can only be enforced through punishment. As for communism, he was anti-Socialist and hated collectivist ideologies, believed very strongly in hierarchy.
>Master morality is about selfishness and rejection of your fellow man
Nietzsche says that the master can often be compassionate and charitable as a result of excess power. He never criticized kindness, only pity, guilt, and the bad conscience, which, even when producing acts of kindness, are born of ressentiment. Two different people can give the same homeless man $20, and one can be a master and the other a slave. It all depends on your reasons.
None of these things I am saying are at all cryptic or confusing in his writing, if you pay attention and read carefully these are incredibly obvious.
What can be done about this? Should all N threads be contained in a general with these obvious and verifiable concepts listed at the top?

>>16677471
It is time for your own war.

There are different kinds of moralties, I thought this was self evident.
What is it with people jumping on "muh brainlets" that don't believe in objective truth?

When the majority believe something, whether it be IRL or the 4chinz, that's a warning that you should be skeptical of it.

I am gonna personally hunt down every last utilitarian

Who cares?

>>16185167
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE HORSEEEEY NOT THE POOR LITTLE HORSERINO