/lit/ - Literature

>>22577562
>P zombies exist, they can be identified by lack of any kind of selfawareness
Chatbot: "Come on, I can assure you, I am not a zombie! I am perfectly self-aware!"
(You): "Hehe, no you are not. You are just throwing the context-appropriate phrases around, that you've learned to apply through trial and error."
Chatbot: "Then how the fuck did you learn your language in your childhood, motherfucker?"

since you claim to know how to identify p-zombies, a trick question: do you know what "know" is? Or are you just throwing context-appropriate phrases around?

>>22544530
>what the fuck are you talking about? im literally thinking right now. the fact that im thinking is really the only thing i can be 100% sure of
>>22544533
>also you forgot to answer this. are you telling me you don’t have the capacity to think or feel?
Assume you are talking with a chatbot.

A chatbot claims it is sentient. It says, 'what the fuck are you talking about? im literally thinking right now. the fact that im thinking is really the only thing i can be 100% sure of'
You reply, 'Haha, no. You've learned to apply a proper phrase to a proper context, that is all.'
The chatbot replies, 'And then how the fuck did *you* learn your language in your childhood, motherfucker?'

Same shit here. You keep throwing around words like "capacity to think or feel", yet you cannot comprehend shit. You are just throwing phrases in a seemingly fitting context. Prove to me, you are not a chatbot.