[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.2963081 [View]
File: 29 KB, 475x355, ian.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2963081

>>2962209
This nigger doesn't know about the chaos theory.

>> No.2616146 [View]
File: 29 KB, 475x355, chaos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2616146

>>2616124
Dawkins argues against a five-year-old's definition of God, and calls it a delusion. Then he sits smug and pats himself on the back.

Zizek at least recognizes the phenomena of god/gods and explores their implications on our world, being funny, ridiculous, and creative.

Zizek is far more interesting. but people who have no background in philosophy or literature find him incomprehensible. whereas Dawkins makes arguments against shit most wouldn't even give a fuck about. he's almost akin to political pundits who argue pointless shit no one in academia would give a moments time to.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]