/lit/ - Literature

>>14237833
Leave all other questions behind.

Man, in his feminine form especially, has triumphed over blinking.

>>13864992
Based.
If accelerationists are so anti-human why aren't they sacrificing themselves to capital?

>>13268662
Science is the worship of ugliness.

>>13168403
>>13168108
In terms of a genealogy, democracy arrives first and should thus be considered the overall power, unless capital either completely subverts it or shows that it is the dominant power. Consider it in a microcosmology, the state legislature is not opposed to the academy or media, yet it is clear that the state body is much more powerful than either of its complimentary arms.
In a similar way, one may come to view capital as the dominant hierarchical or organisational form simply because of their own life within this lifeworld/microcosmology. One may even say that Enlightenment rationality, the worldview that experience is primary, allows and even causes this fragmentation of perceptible worlds to occur.

One of the major ideas of accelerationism is that of retrocausality, or teleoplexy which occurs in the realm of ideas (it's a bit more complex than that, but I think going any further would simply be a distraction, Zizek's ideas may be similar to this?). So here I argue against the idea of any retrocausality by suggesting that the very form and process of capital accumulation appears within the early ideas of liberalism, and rather than being caused by the future it is capital which is derivative. This would be too difficult to explain in short, so I will offer a similar idea, that of the disappearance of capital in the world wars and the total reformation of material production towards war efforts. The wars were certainly not determined by capital, and the incredible changes and effects brought about by the war were much greater than any changes brought about by capital.

One may even go further here, I would say that industrialisation is already the appearance of a returning force of the founding of the New World, the Old World's 'becoming worthy' of this unspeakable destruction of world knowledge. And the industrialisation of the New World is its conflict between a divine natural order and the desire of momentous yet simple reconstruction of civilisation. In this sense, Capital is nothing more than an image slowly coming into reflection through a mirror - the material crystallisation of the metaphysical laws of humanism/modernity.

>>13046184
Spotted the acceltard.

>>12907203

>>12888229
Do you understand basic logic? If this arrives from the singularity of the future then what causes the event to be equal to the object which causes it? And more importantly, what creates the object, the singularity as prime mover from the future? Either it must be there for all time or it is not.
What causes Land to follow Bataille and then split him, following some retard blogger's shit theories about the renaissance?
And he literally says the Earth is captured. You need to read a basic logic book instead of accusing others of not reading.
>The story goes like this: Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalitization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off. Logistically accelerating techno-economic interactivity crumbles social order in auto-sophisticating machine runaway. As markets learn to manufacture intelligence, politics modernizes, upgrades paranoia, and tries to get a grip.
Whole quote.

>>12874000
Absolutely based and digitpilled.
Spermatazoastrians BTFO yet again by the digital valorisation ubermensch. Will they ever learn?

>>12802600
>gabbidull mean mummee
>n mean mummee gud