/lit/ - Literature

>>14588053
zippy zip zoom

>>9475339

Mistake #1:
Victoria Woodhull was a suffragette, not a radical (second wave) feminist.

Mistake #2:
Applying class analysis to other axes of oppression than just classism (such as race and sex) is not equivalent to liberal identity politics.

Mistake #3:
Appeal to authority, thinking that everything God and Father Karl Marx did and said was absolute truth and beauty, is dumb. If you are able to understand that Hillary Clinton's brand of feminism may not be representative of black and working class women or women in the third world, because while Clinton is female, she is part of the white American upper-class, you should be able to understand that Karl Marx's brand of socialism may not be representative of black and female people with additional particular struggles in society, because while Marx may have led the working class, he was white and male.

Also, I have NEVER heard of a feminist claiming that misogynist men on the right are really conservatives in disguise. They consistently talk about "misogyny in the left" when talking about, well, misogyny in the left.

>north invades, starting a war, massacres citizens by the tens of thousands if they had a bad opinion
>north denies peace talks
>decades later people cry about muh evil empire

The u.s. has never bombed somebody that didnt deserve it.

>>7474694
>/lit/ has recently become infested with absolutely shameless tumblr/SJW scum

>>7459339
>Hayao Miyazaki is pretty exceptional.
Yeah, he's of world fame. Doesn't make him any less mainstream. Hell, makes him mainstream as fuck. You can bet on Japan being proud of him. Except for the right-wing fucks. He openly criticizes them after all.

>yadda yadda subculture
Please for the love of deities just tell us what is "mainstream anime" by your contrived standards so it's possible to even respond to you.

>The so-called gender busting roles [are] made because the average Japanese anime viewer is an effeminate male who was too intimidated by the popular girls at his high school
Oh yeah? You know what, you know absolute fuck-shit about anime. How many series have you watched in the last year?
Yeah I bet Akane Tsunemori is made to pander to silly high school boys afraid of girls, and they're supposed to identify with who, fucking Kogami? But you don't even know these characters, do you?
I guess Otonashi from Beats is also just a weak-male pandering character? Not like he has a very strong personality and his nurturing personality is presented as something admirable or anything.
Fate/Zero too is just for effeminate Japanese high school boys I guess. I bet they all aspire to become a lifeless utilitarian robot who kills his own father, mother figure, and figuratively wife and daughter, and the King of England is just a stronk female character for these effeminate Japanese boys to compare to their female classmates.
Yeah, it all makes perfect sense anon, it all makes perfect sense.

>[...] reddit, where they think Madoka was made by feminists to empower young girls [...]
You know a ton about Reddit huh?

>Your entire last paragraph is so vacuous I'm not even certain of what you're trying to say.
Your lack of reading comprehension is not my fault. I was making a relatively simple point that falls more or less under "descriptive moral relativism." In particular, if you judge Japanese society based on American cultural standards, it's no wonder you'll only see the worst of them, with an ironic lack of self-awareness of serious problems in your own culture. This simplistic "culture X is worse than culture Y in general topic Z" is a pretty toxic mentality that leads to idiotic ideas like "stop complaining, look at XYZ if you want to see how *real* discrimination looks!!1one."

>demonstrable through the collapse of the birthrate and increasing unrest among men and women, and resentment harbored towards the opposite sex
If there's anything that "demonstrates" for me it's that women in Japan are very self-aware of their oppressed status in marriage, and protest through lack of participation. To me, this looks more ideal than the young Murrican woman who buys into "sexual liberation" propaganda and lets herself get fucked over while drunk by ten guys a week then wonders why she isn't being respected very much.

>>7434474

First of all, we both know that you can't have a serious discussion on /pol/.

Secondly, I'm trying to post in /his/ now, and they're too retarded to even understand that what I'm posting is on-topic. I got an off-topic warning and a thread removed with zero replies because they literally didn't get that Pornography and Civil Rights is relevant to history, philosophy, etc. This board is simply superior to discuss these things. Blame 4chan and the shittiness of other boards.

>"I disagree, doesn't seem interesting"
>"Prejudiced much?"
Are you implying that they *have* read it or haven't read it? You're the first person to have mentioned to have actually read any books by her. (Apparently one I didn't read.) I also didn't post many posts calling people prejudiced; you're probably conflating me with many other posters because you can't bear the thought that there's several people on /lit/ who are fond of Dworkin.

>More than you apparently at any rate.
I'm about to finish my 5th book by her. Get fugged.

>You've literally referred to your shilling as "spreading the gospel"
Either I made a joke that was so significant I don't even remember it, or you're again confusing me with someone else.

>shilling
>shilling
>shilling
Why don't you just fuck off back to /pol/?