/lit/ - Literature

>you will never realize you are actually a boltzmann brain
>you will never be carried off to Heaven by a "winged insect"

>>6106713

To a pleb maybe. Stirner anticipated that we are each subgradiations of God, which is the physical Universe, and therefore are all Gods. He also predicted Boltzmann brains. Stirner was a very intelligent man who reached our Universe's version of CHIM. You're just too disorientated by spooks to allow yourself to see it.

Nietzche on the hand was just the Negroid version of Stirner.

>>6042472

You say spook, I say Caucasian.

Would Stirner have agreed with Altruism if it causes the individual Egoist pleasure, or is Altruism also a Spook?

I wish Stirner was my dad.

>>4875590
Thinkers like Nietzsche, Sartre and Camus have only added modern moralistic spooks after deconstructing ancient and biblical spooks. As for thinkers like Russell, they are simply continuing a pointless train of analytic philosophic thought that has continued to be the same quasi-rationalist dribble despite any real previous advances in continental philosophy.

>writing gene fiction
Just so you know it probably won't turn out well OP.

Anyway, the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a good source if you want a cursory view of what each philosopher thinks.
>http://plato.stanford.edu/

Or you could describe your characters to us since /lit/ is pretty much the de facto philosophy board. I'm a phil major so I could give you some pointers as to which philosophers match your characters.

>>4784804


ah, we must do away with laws whatsoever then.

>>4769387
>muh categorical imperative
Kant was a shithead who needed to de-spook himself from his 'universal' ideas.

Accept Stirner as your lord and savior.