/lit/ - Literature

>>15729976
>he doesn't use IRC to download ebooks
I don't call it piracy, I call it redistribution of knowledge

>>12428114
>mfw this guy is considered the final bss of philosophy and the left wing
>mfw he's easily destroyed and swept aside by marxism-leninism

>>11456422
>>>/his/
Anon, it is he who creates and destroys that brings forth to this world that which he gives reason. Do not throw away the lessons that time has allowed you the opportunity to learn who you once were, and what that says about yourself now.

>realize I am not better than someone else investing more deeply into their personal hobbies in a way that can enrich many other areas of their life
>stop
How many layers of mental cuckoldry are you on right now my dude?

>>9074973

>mfw I found out Dostoevsky was planning on writing a sequel for Brothers Karamazov

>日本語で一度も本を読んだことがない

>Nunca ha leído ningún libro en español

>>8711538

>Believing in a romanticized ideology made by angsty teenage neets.

>>7495326
I second this.

>>6830394
>tfw showing a high school girl my greek homework got me laid once

in that moment i could have told her i was a wizard

joke's on her, i barely remember how to do the accents anymore

>>6499792
>>6499781
>>6499773
Ok OP this was all very funny but I seriously think you should stop this now

I honestly feel as if you should kill yourself.

What are some texts on effective leadership? not just gaining and holding power, but how to actually wield it to its greatest potential?

>Anarcho-syndicalism

>>5956830
throughout the entirety of A People's History, and I say that as a pretty ardent leftist

>>5912802
>I read until the beginning of Part II

>>5745309

Not sure where to put this thread, trying here as my best bet.

I'm looking to break away from Wikipedia as my go to Encyclopaedia for reference. Not looking for a hardback equivalent, but what would be recommended?

Encyclopaedia Britannica? Or is there other ones out there for general reference to point the user in the right direction?

Are there any books where authors convey the story and dialogue indirectly, to the point of obscuritanism?

Say, for instance, each character has a selection of 1-2 nonsense words while still making dialogue a primary part of the story.

i.e
John stared longingly at Eve and before he knew it, his confidence overcame him; he was walking over. He tapped her shoulder "Blag zag?" Eve turned, shocked. "Zag? Frim zom!" The words shook John to his core, this had taken an ugly turn.

>an alcoholic has never written a bad book

I've heard people say this. Is it true?

>>4102862
>Ethnic homogeneity not working for blacks means it doesn't work for whites and Northeast Asian