/lit/ - Literature

>>22760381
>giga chad poster
>posts the most basic take possible on /lit/
At least spice up the programme.

>>22674729
>"is this physique unrealistic?"
>posts a real person

>>22460415
>not for Eastern ones, which are typically more oriented towards a process philosophy like Alfred N. Whitehead.
>Perennialists are misguided. There were no Hyperboreans. There is no One Primordial Tradition. There are genuine irreconcilable disagreements among various Traditions
>And no, immanence is not defined as being matriarchal or feminine.
Your post is also riddled with inaccuracies btw. It would appear that you have never heard of Cybele and that you mistake the ancient Aryans for Germans alone and no other. From among the civilised nations, only the Germans and the Japanese have the Sun as feminine and the Moon as masculine, and Evola makes a point to criticise this confusion, and it is an obvious confusion if you understand anything about metaphysics at all.

>>21547832
Anon. It just so happens that, coincidentally, the guy on the middle right is the one who created modern science. All this information and discoveries you refer to only exist due to him. This is just one guy on your chart. So, basically, I am afraid that you are the provincial villager retard, after all, since you don't seem to understand what the very root of this science you brag so much about really is.
As to the philosophers you've posted, I am not especially concerned with them either, because they were mostly interested in dumb material shit (the kind of stuff that you probably think is the peak of human knowledge and achievement). I'd choose to read Plato and Laozi over Aristotle and Confucius any day.