/lit/ - Literature

>whether it be

>>3693155
>everything but penis in vagina/asshole

no, they post their awful shit on the internet for feedback. That's far less embarrassing.

>>3132462
awwww I'm sorry I trolled you

friends?

>>1753292
>social networking web sites can damage society by people spending too much time virtually communicating with people rather than engaging in direct communication.

That's not why social networking is bad. Sure, it has retarded people to a point where now they are literally incapable of interacting with people in real life, but the real dangers are in potential identity theft, cyber-stalking, uploading harmful, embarrassing, or incriminating information on yourself which can't be deleted, and the fact that everything you upload to facebook becomes the property of facebook, meaning you don't own any of the information you post about yourself.

I told people that it was only a matter of time until facial recognition software became commercially available and it would become ridiculously easy to identify and stalk people, and then facebook implemented facial recognition software to its website back in December.

That, coupled with the fact that social networks like facebook can't provide you with anything that email and phones can do, makes it a counter-productive way of communicating with your friends-- with a shit ton of more ads!

Also, about your essay. I started skimming it because it was so awful. You don''t cite any sources or provide any statistics. Your essay sounded like this: "Some people say this, but I say that. And then some people think this about facebook, but personally I think this about facebook. I wont provide you with any concrete evidence of the things I say, just take my word for it." It's fucking awful, man. I really hope you're in junior high school, because this shit is inexcusable.

>>1734576
>Brownbear criticizes other people for not discussing literature

I believe this calls for an idiom about a pot calling a kettle black

>EXPOSED
>implying it's even remotely surprising

>>1122261
you know I'm right.

Of all the hundreds of Infinite Jest and Ulysses threads on /lit/ not one of them has even scratched the surface of those novels. They're all just "hurp durp, I'm on page 50, dis book is so kewl u gaize."