/lit/ - Literature

>>19015277
(cont.)
Nothing is more important for the future-- securing the continuity of consciousness, civilisation, and all that is good, than ensuring that people with high characteristics continue to come into being in high numbers, and that the conditions exist under which they may flourish. I don't know whether he even has the remotest sense of the high and the fine as may be embodied in an individual. Despite his many insights, without having an awareness of this need at the forefront of one's concerns, any prescription of his will with near certainty be dysgenic.

"Occupational class", or "nobles"? Somebody must press him on this issue.

How exactly is eugenics better for humanity if it only benefits a select few? Also what criteria are the select few to be allowed to breed based on? Physique? IQ? What types of IQ? I don't really understand why Europeans are so in favor of this when they are just average in IQ and physique. Not to mention a lot of society's progression has been based on sharing information between cultures. Am I stupid for thinking that it's not the most beneficial for man to decide who and who doesn't get to live based on the criteria of a few Europeans? Or am I missing something here.

>>6891360
It's a sucky hypothesis who lends itself to a political agenda. Enter forced sterilizations etc.

>>2658386
They also loan money to buy a car they don't need. Or have babies without thinking it true. Or pets. Or get married. Many people are stupid fucks who can't into long term thinking. The sad thing is that these kind of qualities drive them to reproduce much more since they don't afraid of anything.

God tier: Philosopher
Great tier: Statesman
Good tier: Scientist
Mid tier: Warrior
Low tier: Worker
Shit tier: Merchant