/lit/ - Literature

>>15103089
>Where
>Who tf cares

>Deflect and seethe
Yup
>NOOOOO WHO CARES IF I GOT THAT BLATANTLY WRONG, FOCUS ON X

>hurr you monarchist
I'm not him anon, I'm laughing at your stupidity

>Aquinas, Feser

Yes

>Meditations, Descartes

Yes

>Ethics, Spinoza

Yes. Good read, but I only read the first two sections because I'm just interested in the metaphysics.

>Political Order and Political Decay, Fukuyama

Yes. It's interesting, especially his critique of the structure of the US gov./Constitution, but I was failed to be convinced of his anti-anti-statism because he doesn't give much of an argument for it. He takes it a priori that the modern world needs large, robust governments.

>Philosophical Essays, Leibniz (read the Monadology, etc.)

Yes, but he is sort of an insufferable autist.

>The Closing of the American Mind, Bloom

No. I couldn't be assed to go very far in it because of the overly poetic prose which seems to be there to hide the lack of arguments.

>An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Locke

Yes. I read sections of it. I didn't realize it was so damn long.

>Treatise of Human Nature, Hume

Yes. Again, I was just there for the metaphysics/epistemology.

>Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume

Yep

>>5725947
>this board is the one of the most serious boards in 4chan.