/lit/ - Literature

>>3373837
>Buy E-books

>>2976395

stfu.jpg
getout.gif

>>2877142
>>>/google/

>>2780647

>>2699140

>he thinks psychoanalysis is invalidated cause it is not a "science"
>he thinks lacanians are relevant
>he thinks science is definitive

Freud was a man of his time, so he needed to claim the scientific character of his theories. However many people have done interpretations of freud out of this scientific need. Wittgenstein and Levi-Strauss for instance.

What is stupid is not still referencing psychoanalysis, but still doing it with a scientific need.

>>2663373

>>2633609
>>2633551
>implying philosophy means or tries to be useful

>mu
>tripfag

that is the worst thing u can find in 4chan.

>>2540833
>And they can be practiced without the metaphysical bullshit
>practiced without the metaphysical bullshit
>practiced
>metaphysical bullshit
>metaphysical
>bullshit

oh man, how can some one be so stupid? are you 5?

you're right. i remember i decided to give it a try some years ago and after 50-60 pages i couldn't continue... i guess you really have to deeply know the context to get it.

>>2255315
oh man, i am not reading this!!! i am not fucking reading this!!!
i seriously hope this tard is an isolated case, tho i'm compelled to think the opposite.

if you are "not reading propaganda", you sure are living according to another propaganda that pre-defines everything for you. a book is not anything in itself, anything! the approach you have makes the book what it becomes to you.

i hope you were trolling

>>2194071
>implying everything that what Freud "discovered" wasn't already there centuries before