/lit/ - Literature

>>12653536

>>11295547
Oh you memers.

Here, read this short thing
https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/money-and-myth-barter

>>7275313
His point is that things can indeed change.

>>7275315
They fail for their violence. The sheeple have taken the leads of Christianity and now liberal-capitalism because they offered them comforts
Marxism needs to reconcile Stirner into it's doctrines.

From the other thread: >>/lit/thread/S6282261
>Capitalism is the best system we currently have to implement.
Re pictured
>The only major problem is with the excesses; it goes too far.
It is designed specifically to support classes. Some, the upper classes, the comforted classes, support this sort of thing. They're prejudiced creeps that don't think too hard and believe "equality" is a dirty word. "Excesses" you say? Capitalism doesn't cause that directly, but it does cause corruption. Also take note that they like to turn it around and all people's sex lives corrupt or excessive while ignoring the corruption excessiveness of the wealthy.
>If we found a way to restrain capitalism we would be living in a bretty good society. Easier said than done though.
We know damn well what can make it *better*. It's socialism. Add just a little, strong unionism, social security, a GI bill to put people in higher education tuition free, and you get a pretty comfy economy. Add even more and it gets better. That was a progressive liberal solution that worked really good.
Ah but wait. The mechanisms for corruption were all still in place. The high taxed billionaires (or their kids) bought politicians favors to slash their taxes and bust the unions they felt were eating *their* money, etc.

No, capitalism ought to go, and as soon as possible. The times are critical.