[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21499369 [View]
File: 39 KB, 595x421, Disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21499369

>>21499122
>Discord

>> No.11348315 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, 1471395590719.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11348315

>tfw fucking homos try to claim Byron as one of their own by saying he preferred men to women

I get that he was bisexual but not every bisexual person likes both sexes equally.

>> No.8406084 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8406084

>>8406016
>I have no legitimate argument to back my assertion so i'll just tell you that i don't feel like explaining and ask you to believe me.

>> No.8335017 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8335017

>>8335007
oh this cunt again. i've seen this post here before. no one gives a shit about this made up story. the one who posted it before even admitted that he did this as a part of some dumb experiment where he was trying to play a character.
if you're that anon again then please fuck off and come back when you have something better to post. if you're not him then please fuck off and come back when you have something original or interesting to post.

saged and reported this cancer.

>> No.8112793 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8112793

>>8112763

I'm not sure if you're a really subtle troll or genuinely this stupid or just a teenager who's read his first book. Either way, you should stop posting.

>what's the moral of the story
seriously how fucking old are you?
>what's up with shit eating edith
had you actually read the fucking book instead of skimming over it and rushing here to shitpost you would know.
>was stoner betrayed by everyone
being this dumb.. not grasping the finer nuances of why stoner failed in all the different ways in his life. putting it all under the umbrella of "betrayal". you're a special sort of retard aren't you.


seriously. don't post again. instead go and reread the book. maybe this time you'll actually pay attention. idiot.

>> No.7956473 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7956473

this thread is proof that we have redditors among us because there are posters here like >>7956362 who think they've read something with at least an iota of literary merit which is worthy of an analysis that they think is "deep".

considering the reddit, /mu/, /pol, /r9k invasions this board is truly fucked.

>> No.7952012 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7952012

Are people here trying to be pretentious tumblr pseudo-intellectual hipsters who derive some sort of arrogant superiority complex from the fact that they read slightly more than others?

Or is all of this ironic? I can't tell where the pretentiousness ends and the irony begins.

>> No.7932413 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7932413

>>7932408

that's not what i said at all but great reply to an imagined argument.

i was emphasizing the importance of brevity in both serious literature and bullshit pop media. but sure, be as verbose as you can, resort to a strawman when called out and hope that some day you can develop some decent reading comprehension.

>> No.7928611 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7928611

this thread is one of the worst examples of pseuds wanking over their delusions of superiority over le sheep.

yeah, all of you are the guardians of high art and are among the select few who can appreciate the highest form of intellectual literature while all of the rest read pleb books or dont.

literally the most conceited thread here in quite some time. also, one of the stupidest considering that autists here have chosen to delude themselves into thinking that literature will "die out" soon.

saged this shitpost.

>> No.7925018 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7925018

>>7924949

>mutilating books through highlighters and pencils.

kill yourself.

>> No.7881238 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7881238

ok. now go the fuck back to /tv/ and don't come back. dumb frogposter.


saged.

>> No.7881155 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7881155

>>7881061

Not who you responded to.

I appreciate your attempt to exorcise the /pol/ boogeyman and agree with you on the laziness of discrediting opinions using it.

However, before you take the righteous moral high ground, I want you to know that your attempt at dismissing the article is equally shitty if not shittier.

>If you think the article is right you're a MORON.

what kind of an idiot does one have to be to condemn AND still use a boogeyman in the same post? Either post content that adds to the discussion or get the fuck out and stop bullshitting with your sermon.

If you actually read the fucking article which I doubt you did you'd realize that this information is a sort of confession from someone who
>was chief of the Soviet division of the CIA's Operations Directorate in the 1950s and 1960s and was an expert on the USSR and defectors.

but no. the cia is confessing probably as ajoke or something right?

>> No.7762145 [View]
File: 40 KB, 595x421, disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7762145

Learn how to fucking use google and educate your own god damn self.

why do you want us to spoonfeed you the details? figure this shit out on your own.

do you go to /tv/ to ask which television set to buy?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]