[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18516979 [View]
File: 577 KB, 6585x5055, west phil v23.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18516979

Can somebody please upload the most up to date version of this chart? I downloaded mine like a year ago and I'm sure there must be a newer one...thanks in advance.

>> No.18210818 [View]
File: 577 KB, 6585x5055, 1620575681136.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18210818

>>18210295

>> No.18209017 [View]
File: 577 KB, 6585x5055, 1601609901203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18209017

>>18208032
Found it!!!!!

>> No.16489486 [View]
File: 577 KB, 6585x5055, ahhhhhh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16489486

Hey lads. It's going to happen. Slow and steady.

RECOMMEND categories and relationships inside categories

WAIT on recommending cross-category relationships, except maybe primary/paramount ones

HOW TO RECOMMEND:
"Category Z
A -> B
B -> C
C -> D
C -> E

blah blah E is important to Z because A and B blah blah"


HOW NOT TO RECOMMEND:
Copy and pasting lists of names
Huge paragraph of text


The Christian /lit/ posters are doing great with their recs, so their flow seems the most fleshed out. The lefty posters just spammed lists of names and panicked for half a thread because Zizek wasn't on there.

Sorry if I miss your recommendation. The more it is formatted in the context of the existing chart, categorized, and simple, the more likely it'll be attached. I have a lot of cross category relationships saved (in notes and the first version of the chart).

FYI I don't decide if someone goes on the chart, how relevant they are decides if it goes on the chart. Except Logicians lmao (maybe)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]