/lit/ - Literature

He is harder to understand than Hegel. The book of lies in particular is impossibly cryptic. You'd have to look up the meaning of every single line, and then you would still have trouble understanding it.

Max Stirner will be always btfo’d by this guy because he was one of the few people who genuinely didn’t fall for any spooks, materialism is a massive philosophical spoon and any assertion it isn’t is a philosophical scam and hoax. Crowley wanted be a wizard,
so he became a wizard, Crowley wanted to fuck and do drugs, so fucked and did drugs, Crowley wanted to achieve enlightenment while fucking and doing drugs and doing whatever he wanted, so he did exactly that, Crowley wanted to make his own religion and make himself a prophet centred around ‘do what thou wilt’, so he did exactly that.


You cannot even attempt to claim to be even an inch close to being as unspookable as this guy, he didn’t give a shi t

Why did he get replaced with Evola and Guenon? When I was in my teens and 20s esoterica phase everyone read Crowley.

Is it just that being right wing became transgressive and contrarian over the 2010s, so now Crowley is too degenerate and Evola is based?

Thoughts?

>>16817002
Don't bother, Yeats got BTFO'd by Crowley

>>16817469
Thelema. I can't express why, but it makes the most sense to me. I've explored pretty much every religion, both mainstream and fringe, major and minor, and nothing felt completely right until I stumbled upon Crowley and Thelema.