/lit/ - Literature

>>22270001
>the sorts of women willing to leave their high fertility homes to do higher status work in a foreign country are themselves selecting against the mommy gene.
All this means is that immigrant populations will have lower fertility than their counterparts in the countries they came from. This wouldn't affect fertility among the native population in the countries they immigrate to.

>the artificial anti-life pressures which have made having children in a Western country into a form of economic self-sabotage avoided by "rational" actors because of the extreme expensive of producing a "successful" adult
I don't see how poverty is supposed to somehow negate the breeder transition. You don't need to be "successful" in a modern sense in order to survive and reproduce, which is all that matters in an evolutionary sense. People have lived in extreme poverty throughout all of history, and yet they still reproduced. Africans today still live in extreme poverty, and yet they have some of the highest fertility rates in the world. So saying that natality is economic self-sabotage doesn't seem like a valid argument against the breeder transition.

>We've even controlled for the horniness that should have caused babies to born—pornography accessible on every smartphone.
Porn is yet another selection pressure. First of all, since women are the limiting factor of reproduction, you only need a small number of men to do the reproducing and impregnate the women, while the rest of the men will watch porn. Second of all, some people have religious beliefs that make them anti-pornography, which could make them less susceptible to the fertility-lowering effects of porn.

>>20424619
The women that aren't having kids are just weeding themselves out of the gene pool. There will be a fertility resurgence in the long run.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5X18lqyDO0
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/breeders-revenge/

>>17631532
Based

>>15847750
>He is forty-three, unmarried, and childless.
Natural selection at work

>>14954449
Religious people also have the fertility rates. Christianity's short term decline will likely not be a long term trend.

https://www.unz.com/akarlin/where-do-babies-come-from/
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/breeders-revenge/

>>14824179
>why should we carry on tradition?
Because it's evolutionarily adaptive. Non-traditional people generally have sub-replacement fertility.

Let natural selection do it

>>14491411
>>14491416
t. brainlets who don't understand how demographics works

>>14007147
Natural selection is weeding out the people who aren't.

http://www.unz.com/akarlin/breeders-revenge/

>>13940294
>Are there any books or literature that will help me be open-minded? The thought of taking pills to grow boobs or chopping off your penis and shit just grosses me out.
Just remember that when they chop their balls off, they are actively weeding themselves out of the gene pool.

>>13825424
>How can you manage to bring back tradition after two centuries of Modernity?
Just let degenerates weed themselves out of the gene pool.

>>13346244
Right wingers are the only people having kids, so this isn't that unlikely.