/lit/ - Literature

>>23102017
>The idea that all life has no purpose at all is also subjective.
Lmao no
>You really are a gross person.
I think the same thing about you amplified to a thousand. I'd break your fucking skull in, you fucking trash.
but they also do the most amazing, good, beautiful things, and I love that part of humanity.
Kek no, they are absolute organic garbage.
>Hmmm, maybe you never have done anything good for anybody in your life, but I know that when I do good things for people, people tend to like it for some weird reason. It's not always the case, but there is a pretty strong correlation there.
Not moral, helping people (morally talking) in any way is retarded as fuck
Helping someone feel good is not even considered moral for normal ethics. You're a woman? Because you definitely don't care about being honorable
>Otherwise, I guess you don't care about making a difference at all, so you should just quit your yapping.
Doing anything for them is impossible. There are 8 billion people who do the opposite (morally talking) every millisecond of the day, avoiding the evil they do would be avoiding all those milliseconds. I haven't even managed to avoid a second so far, in fact I've increased them like everyone else does. It's almost impossible, this place is definitely hell lmao.
>I haven't addressed it in this conversation yet, but for some reason you seem to value the lives humans and other species equally. Which is pretty bizarre (it's not like any other species would value your life equally). How far does that extend (would you be willing to sacrifice a child to save a dozen animals, a 100 animals, maybe a whole species?)?
I don't consider them equal, they are both organic garbage, yes. But humans are a trillion times worse. And obviously it would not save either the child or the animals, the best thing would be (morally speaking) for the entire species of animals to become extinct and the retarded child to die alongside them.