/lit/ - Literature

>>21731642


HOW CAN A MANGA BE SIMILAR TO A NOVEL, OR ANY OTHER LITERARY OPVS? HOW CAN MANGA BE LITERARY?

>>21298040
>135. Writer's block is bullshit.

YES.


>I've been writing for close to a decade now, and have not the faintest notion of the thing; it's merely a euphemism for slaves who want to make a living out of scribbling because they are too lazy to do anything else.

IDEOLOGICALLY BIASED OVERSIMPLIFICATION; YOU ARE PRESUPPOSING THE NIETZSCHEAN DICHOTOMOUS FALLACY OF «MASTER – SLAVE»; MOST INDIVIDUALS WHO «WANT TO BECOME WRITERS», NOT HAVING THE TALENT, NOR THE SKILL, TO WRITE, MUCH LESS THE STYLE, HAVE THAT DESIRE DUE TO AN IDEALIZATION OF THE LITERARY AUTHOR, NOT BECAUSE OF «LAZINESS TO DO ANYTHING ELSE»; WRITING IS NOT A PROFESSIONAL AVENUE THAT APPEALS TO THE ACTUALLY LAZY.


>If a writer has something to say, it comes out by itself[...]

NO; WRITING —IN CONTRAST TO MERE SCRIBBLING— IS AN ART; ART REQUIRES TALENT, SKILL, AND STYLE; NOT EVEN PROPHETS USED TO WRITE WITHOUT THINKING, NOR ARTLESSLY.


>[...] if he doesn't, then what's the point in WANTING to write? — Money, of course.

FAME, STATVS...


ADDENDVM: I PREFER «GANGBANG OF REASON», MUCH BETTER.

ETHNOCENTRIC «COLOURISM» IS A BARBARIC INDICATOR; UNITEDSTATIANS REDUCE EVERYTHING TO «WHITE», «BLACK», «BROWN», ET ALIA PSEUDORACIAL IDENTITIES, WHICH IS WHY ANY ATTEMPT AT RATIONAL DISCOURSE IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM, ENDING UP LOOKING LIKE ATAVISTIC, SAVAGE BUFFOONS; THIS ETHNOCENTRIC SEGREGATION IS ALSO THE CAUSE OF UNITEDSTATES' SOCIOPOLITICAL DISGREGATION & STRIFE: UNITEDSTATIAN PEOPLES DO NOT CONSTITUTE A NATION; THEY ARE A MERE AGGREGATE OF PSEUDORACIAL, QUASITRIBAL «CULTURES», AND «SUBCULTURES»; THANK «PROTESTANTISM».

THE ONES WORSE THAN UNITEDSTATIANS, IN THIS RESPECT, ARE THE INFINITE IDIOTS WHO IMPORT THESE CATEGORIES —CRITICALLY, OR ACRITICALLY— FOR USE IN THEIR QUOTIDIANITY, IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES, THEMSELVES NOT BEING ANGLOIDAL, NOR EVEN «PROTESTANTISTIC», HAHA.

>WHEN ONE COMPLETES ONE HOUR OF LESSONS ON «DUOLINGO» MERELY TO KEEP THE POSITION IN THE DIAMOND LEAGUE.

>>18397547

>— eVeRYTHiNG iS ReLaTiVe.

>— IF EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE YOUR IDIOCY IS ABSOLUTE.

>— B- BuT...

>— NO.

THE NOTION THAT MEN ARE ATTRACTED TO WAR DUE TO A ROMANTICIZED CONCEPTION OF IT IS ITSELF A ROMANTICISTIC NOTION; MOST MEN, AND SOME WOMEN, ARE ATTRACTED TO WAR, BECAUSE THE HEALTHY HUMAN SPIRIT IS INHERENTLY ATTRACTED TO CONFLICT, AND WAR IS THE CONFLICT BY ANTONOMASIA; WAR, AND WORLD, GO TOGETHER, AND INTO THEM COMES THE HUMAN.

THE PROBLEM OF WAR IS REDUCIBLE TO A PROBLEM OF HOW TO WAGE IT, AND ON WHAT PRINCIPLES, AND IN PRO OF WHAT END; THERE IS NO PEACE, AND THERE CAN NEVER BE PEACE; ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD EARNESTLY BELIEVE THAT HUMANS SHOULD STRIVE FOR PEACE ON EARTH, WHEN, ACTUALLY, WAR IS NEVER MORE BRUTAL AS WHEN FOR PEACE; THE ONLY SEMBLANCE OF PEACE ON EARTH THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED IS MONOPOLIZATION OF THE MINISTRATION OF CONFLICT, WHICH IS WHY A UNIVERSAL EMPIRE IS THE OPTIMAL POLITICAL ORGANIZATION.