[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.15455715 [View]
File: 15 KB, 285x280, 1565153771705.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15455715

angel in me: stay home, get through the last part of Kant, write an essay, then exercise.

devil in me: pick up some blow and a bottle of gin, go meet up with some girls and get laid

>> No.14814245 [View]
File: 15 KB, 285x280, 1557866952923.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14814245

This apparently how philosophers prove fatalism, ie that whatever will happen in the future is already unavoidable:

(1) There exist now propositions about everything that might happen in the future.[1]
(2) Every proposition is either true or else false.
(3) If (1) and (2), then there exists now a set of true propositions that, taken together, correctly predict everything that will happen in the future.
(4) If there exists now a set of true propositions that, taken together, correctly predict everything that will happen in the future, then whatever will happen in the future is already unavoidable.
∴ (5) Whatever will happen in the future is already unavoidable.

Are these people for real? I mean, how can you not see a glaring hole in this argument?

>> No.14127145 [View]
File: 15 KB, 285x280, 1546293722584.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14127145

You all need to explain your answers.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]