/lit/ - Literature

God is dead

Correct order for reading Nietzsche? Let's hear it.

I'm reading Nietzsche after finishing most of Schopenhauer's works, and I can't find anywhere the explanation of Nietzsche's position on life actually being preferable to non-existence. Schopenhauer provided many proofs for why non-existence is preferable, while Nietzsche seems to take it for granted. I'm not sold on it. Can some wizard explain this to me?

philosophy will never be taught in K-12

>>21394252
I have this theory that in actuality, it's you, me and everyone else who thinks that he isn't "normies" is the actual normie - "incapable of perception of good, evil and the higher truth"

Ironically, why do you seek the truth? Why do you need to know the "good and evil"? Couldn't it be that the reason you look for answers is because it's you who doesn't know here. It's you who has been born ignorant, unlike supposed "normies", who didn't need to spend their life "searching for answers" since they were simply more intuitive at their birth and the supposed "truth" was an obvious realization the moment they grasp the concept and so they moved on living this meaningless life, with it's illusions of every emotion and passing moments.

Unlike you, who have been born with retarded intuition, couldn't grasp the true world that you have been thrown in and now, having this infinite voided inside you, substitute it with this ethernal quest for truth, because of its severity twisting it, as though it's not you who's ignorant here, but "they", creating and living in this world of elaborate webworks of supposed moralities and insights, almost as though hiding from the simple and absolute dreading truths of existence that, again, supposed normies had already surpassed, accepted and moved on in being true puppets that we are all meant to be.

>>21343205
Damng!, Thanks! That is looking cursed, eyes that of the black voids, just like the guy himself had..

>>21311344
Any neural stimulant overdrives of preceptors. There is a "regular" state of your body that you then overdrives, which create withdrawal or adjustment periods for the body to get into the "regular" state.

Simply put, you are borrowing happiness from the next day. The only way it is acceptable if the current day is not like the other, meaning it is inspired, and if you have this inspiration moment you might as well prolong it with a "lil help from a friend".

But you already knew that...

>>21314423
Nice, you said it yourself. Jung appeals to young, Freud therefore to old. But behind these surface level identifiers, what do they actually represent?, well, ironically, exactly the positions that these individuals present.

Jung, representing young people also represents their mind, or rather its archetype, using the lingo of a man himself. It's a very creative and radical mind. It is also a passionate mind, but with that comes carelessness which is in part out of pure inexperienced leading to plainly wrong decisions. It is something that when man becomes "mature" is actually long for, ironically, after he himself severed it for nothing but assimilation for social conformity.

Now Freud is an embodiment of "maturity". But what does that mean?, Well, the only good thing it represents is consistency, which is only good on paper and on the ears of like minded individui. This consistency is achieved through exact opposition of creativity - reduction, which is exactly what Freud is famous for, a single theory of a single variable that is consistently proven in practice.

A great achievement one may say, yet in reality it is nothing more than a fruit that is of the lowest longitude, begging to be harvested or else it will drop in someone's hand itself.

It's a mature thought to "settle", not only in body but in mind. Yet to settle in mind is to be not considered a seeker anymore, which is exactly what Freud is in contrast to Jung. An individual who arrived and settled the second he found success.

It is perfectly fine as long as conversation is about treatment inside the walls of a local clinic, but the second this dialogue of topic leaves its origin and destination, like it is right now, ironically, it is completely lost, like a child that he truly is in face of broader objective reality.

Unlike Jung ,who childishly, without concern of an individual, unloads the true adsurdity of reality to an individual inside the walls, leaving him with all tools at the mercy of his own self will, yet opens the same doors of local clinic to the broader world and gives us a comprehensive tour of our psychic reality like a true elder he is.

All his life he tried so hard to do without God, to be an atheist, to be enough for himself, but like Ahab, like Ivan, like Antigone, he failed utterly in his quest. And while the others are only made up characters, Nietzsche is the real life embodiment of the atheist: a failed one. Nietzsche was the modern Christ. And I am not talking about the hollywood version of atheism we have today, atheism is not the negation of the divine but it is prior to both the negation and the affirmation of God, to be outside of God and still remain. What a loser.

Did i kill this thread?

>>20696771
>Nietzsche's objections to Wagner's music are physiological—as he listens to Wagner's music his whole body feels discomfort: He does not breathe easily, his feet begin to rebel, as they do not find a desire to dance or march being satisfied.

>The curiously limitation of human development - the way it hesitates, takes so long, often regresses, and turns around on itself - is based on the fact that the herd instinct of obedience is passed on best and at the expense of the art of commanding. If we imagine this instinct at some point striding right to its ultimate excess, then there would finally be a total lack of commanders and independent people, or they would suffer inside from a bad conscience and find it necessary first to prepare a deception for themselves in order to be able to command, as if they, too, were only obeying orders. This condition is what, in fact, exists nowadays in Europe: I call it the moral hypocrisy of those in command. They don't know how to protect themselves from their bad conscience except by behaving as if they were carrying out older or higher orders (from ancestors, the constitution, rights, law, or even God), or they even borrow herd maxims from the herd way of thinking, for example, as "the first servant of their people" or as "tools of the common good."
did Nietzsche predict neoliberal praxis and morality? Think about how many American leaders support immigration/globalization under the guise of “human rights” when it really just means cheaper labor and a population with no national identity (easier to control)

>>19068932
> translation

Is 4chan an inherently Nietzschean culture?

Are we the ubermen

"Just be yourself lol" -Neech

Is this a good summation of what he had to say in BG&E and Gay Science

when will (((they))) start banning german philosophy in schools?

when was the last time you used philosophy?

>>17146440
> he fell for the debunked neurosyphilis meme
Nietzsche died from brain hemorrhage following stroke. He lived his whole life with numerous diseases, yet still wrote voluminously and lived life as bravely as he could. Amor fati, Anon.

>>17152943
The Gay Science, unironically.

> The Virgin Evola
"hurr durr ride le tiger"
> The NietzsCHAD
"I am in a mood of fatalistic ‘surrender to God’ –I call it amor fati, so much so, that I would be willing to rush into a lion’s jaws."

> I want to learn more and more to see as beautiful what is necessary in things; then I shall be one of those who makes things beautiful. Amor fati: let that be my love henceforth! I do not want to wage war against what is ugly. I do not want to accuse; I do not even want to accuse those who accuse. Looking away shall be my only negation. And all in all and on the whole: some day I wish to be only a Yes-sayer.

Is Nietzsche basically saying Christians are utterly cucked by God?

>>16541350
>He was you more of a poet saying whatever he liked.
this

>>16541268
Send your ships into uncharted seas! Live at war with your peers and yourselves! Be robbers and conquerors as long as you cannot be rulers and possessors, you seekers of knowledge!" The Gay Science

His work is antiphilosophical in a similar sense of Diogenes, Heraclitus, Deleuze. Just appreciate Nietzsche for the madman he is Anon, learn to become an overman in your own phantasy, as he did; weep over a whipped horse in the street.

>>16076470
>>16076610
>-What?

Please come back JP