/lit/ - Literature

>>22704337
>>22704328
I always thought of De Juvenal's critique of the jews to be on-point of both jews and Nietzsche: both use any convenient ideology as a glib vehicle to will-to-power power itself with no purpose outside of arbitrary accumulation. Power without purposes is non-teleological; thus it's non-transcendent as no amount of power leads to any form of salvation on an individual or group level; it just becomes an aesthetic experience. In Nietzsche's optimal case: the "winner" becomes the biggest prisoner in the material prison.

I find the fact that fact that most Nietzschean types to today are anti-jew is ironic and just ressentiment at losing at their own game. It's like Libertarianism who resent Neoliberals for grabbing State power when it was being sold wholesale, lamented the fact they should eschewed their moral principles earlier before they became politically disenfranchised.
Following this Nietzschean "philosophy" just leads to a schizophrenic metaworldview of glibly adopting any/all inconsistent & incoherent philosophies/ideologies if it means you'll might get some power; paradoxically this master mentality acquiesces to a slave mentality of accepting this power dynamic for illusionary power via other people's arbitrary wills/values.
This worldview becomes viciously circular and self-defeated under its own weight.
I have no respect for modern Nietzscheans.