/lit/ - Literature

>>7433982

>>7039115
>>7038936
Alright you fucking dolts, you're perniciously wrong and it makes me fucking mad.

You don't understand fucking bukowski because you've grown up with that fucking slit between your legs that imparts value from birth. The female condition is one of vibrant "Flowering" value and then slow decline. This is not the case with the male of the species, and it gives rise to authors like Hemingway and Bukowski whose central themes are more or less DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE to the male struggle for value on a societal, sexual and personal level. Bukowski's eclectic passive-aggression - his appeals to masculinity, his constant talking about being "big", a "Hairy ape" - these are uniquely male themes that he is describing that speak directly to the bearer of a penis who has constantly, subtly and unforgivingly had the struggle for value and status impressed upon him from the day he was born.

Sure, you can appreciate it, everyone can appreciate something, but there is an immutable core essence of these writers that you won't get, and this is precisely why.


Fuck off back to tumblr you idiot.

Pic related, it's you and your imbecile ilk.

inb4 bait, i don't even care anymore. Google "bukowski tattoos" if you want to be disappointed.