/lit/ - Literature

>>17327482
Yes it's bait but it's also 100% serious.

> capitalism is bad
LOL okay former Zeitgeist fans

He's right and worse, we're domesticated and fully enslaved without even realizing it now.

I can't stand the character assassination Hayek gets, especially from spastic marxists calling him the god of the Neo-Liberal boogeyman.

He was a beautiful mind and wrote extremely important works in a way that was flawed for people looking for extremely rigorous and uncompromising rhetoric and logic. This main fucking played with ideas while writing in way that allows the reader to go through and play with ideas at the same time.

May I suggest:
> Liberalism, by Mises
Particularly Chapter 2, but definitely the introduction on Liberalism and Capitalism.
> The Anti-Capitalist Mentality, by Mises
May add some clarity and a nice perspective considering your roots
> The Constitution of Liberty, by Hayek
This has great chapters on modern marxism, capitalism, the liberty movement and how it all links together. Including a whole chapter on Hayek's nobel prize winning ideas about the use of knowledge in society and the limits of central planning. (the beauty of spontaneous voluntary order)

These guys both write in completely different ways. Mises is cold, hard, extremely rational. If he has an idea about what is true he will shove the logic down your throat and if there's an idea that he sees as untrue he will dismantle it piece by piece.

Hayek on the other hand doesn't have that kind of unwavering certainty, in stead he likes to play with ideas even in his books. You'll feel like you're going on the journey of thinking these things through with the author so you might find one more enjoyable than the other but both are phenominal. Glhf.

>>9741733

>late capitalism

For how many more centuries will we have to cope with this stupid meme?

>>9040023

https://mises.org/library/intellectuals-and-socialism-0

>>7386604
>mad men
>good
I could agree with The Sopranos tho.

>tfw /his/ has made this board completely obsolete

Later fags

Enjoy your dfw and Marxism circlejerks

I bet Schopenhauer's speaking voice sounded just like Hayek

>he works or aspires to work for the parasitic British government

>>6697552

ITT: writers whose faces need to be punched so bad it should be a major crime not to do it.