/lit/ - Literature

>>15245789
Wrong because crime doesn't cease to exist when there's no policing

>So, of course Stoner is not a perfect novel. There’s no such thing, but if there were, it definitely wouldn’t sympathize with marital rape or demonize characters who are not cisgendered, fully abled white men. To state the obvious, no novel can be all-inclusive. Committee art is rarely of good quality. But a novel that actively shuts out readers because of their gender or skin color? The time for celebrating a novel like that, for glorifying it to the point of biographizing its author, should be long over.
https://medium.com/the-establishment/the-man-who-wrote-the-mediocre-novel-aaab9ef2efc6

>>13477144
lmao this namefag. i'd be willing to bet that you suffer from an anxiety disorder, and likely some sort of depression. just because you're fat and spread your legs does not make you enlightened. but then again, there really is no point in reasoning with hyper-emotional, irrational people such as yourself ;-)

go back to the kitchen.