/lit/ - Literature

>>16768591
endulge me:
Regard this from the point of view of a Nietzschean: Technocapital in the aspect you engage it in gains the status of some God (especially if it really is considered inevitable and omnipresent, forever self-augmenting) and combined with aspects such as
>be a slave the rest of my life for the algorithm(TM)
aka. paying tribute and being indebt to it, it should invariable be perceived as not jsut anti-human (das Leben verneinend) but against a nietzschean conception of man.
Imo this is only the case if one really sees a disparate technocapital from man and not that technocapital is man's Will to Power (and still separate form any perceived herd insinct).
Instead of some typical metaphysical notion that looms over man telling him that what he believes only stems from this notion, it is entirely man who creates this technocapital. What I mean by this is that it is not another notion of morality such as "good", which firstly only allows good and bad actions to exist, but technocapital (in this sense) is beyond such fantasies. The tendency to fall back on the ones who lack the WtP and perceive technique as some God (from the future) is the same as returning to the medieval christian, the ancient greek giving sacrifice or the jew. Absolutely nothing is gained when man returns to perceive himself as powerless in the technological society and solely abiding to its bidding, molding and forming man to fit its needs and changing the tele of men to the means of technique away from their humanist ideals (which in face of their impotence they surrender and instead start to espouse technique's means as their tele).
If one really wants to embody the nietzschean spirit, one recognizes technocapital as only stemming from man and as a result of man's WtP. Suffering isn't "bad" jsut as pleasures aren't "good". How could anyone ever still say this when engaging in Nietzschean inspired philosophy that hasn't yet actually deviate away again to something before N?

1/2

>>13345058
okay that was actually good

>>12865801
>the Crypto-Current book...i don't know, i just feel like everybody is playing catch-up to him. [...] BTC isn't capital in the same way that capital is for Marxists of an earlier generation, i'm convinced. it only makes sense in terms of intelligence production, and there is nothing else to root for going forward other than that, he's really right about this.
unironically makes me feel like we're seeing the next Copernican revolution happening in its exhausting birthing pains. hopefully I'll be around to see what slithers out of that cursed womb...

>>12552240
Skip to the Ding an sich

>>12139379
this

>>11946869
black is the new white.

Actually he looks like this.

>>11715186
you deserve it

>>11487389
based

I see no problems here.