[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.8559916 [View]
File: 160 KB, 1314x687, totally normal prose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8559916

>>8555870
>highest likelyhood of satisfaction
>Dune

>> No.8541552 [View]
File: 160 KB, 1314x687, totally normal prose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8541552

>>8541495
Yes, but when talking for example about Dune, this is clearly not the case. It seriously baffles my mind how anyone can read that tripe and be like "ye, that was a fluent read". You dont have to be Nabokov or Faulkner, I just want "prose" that isnt so fucking shit, that I'm reminded every 5-10 sentences that Im reading a shittily written book.

I have nothing against "simple" prose like Clarke uses, but I absolutely cannot tolerate reading something that ignores the "show dont tell"-guideline on nearly every fucking page of the book.

I dont even want to talk about the """""action"""""" """""scenes""""".

pic related
its just one of the heights the prose can get to in Dune

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]