/lit/ - Literature

>>19254485

Indeed, I'm not a native english speaker and I made some mistakes sorry
That's about the filioque and most importantly it's interpretation by the west to oppose orthodoxy (which where excommunication by the legate of the pope for this supposed heresy in 1054). From this, a new triadology developed that shaped the new western christian world. The dogma of the Trinity is central for christians and it is the purpose of my book to show with examples how the change in dogma had a profound impact on the western christianism.
For orthodox, catholics are heretics for the filioque and their completely different trinity.
So when I talk about history it's about the schism, the nominalist crisis, the X-XIIth century,...

>>19254740
Just to note, that's not me
>academic publishing

That's another idea I have but I don't have a master degree. I don't know what magazines I could ask for this. I don't know how to search for one and if someone could accept someone with only a licence to publish in it.

Sorry for the late answer, I had an internet problem

>>18282524
>>18282483
>>18282477
>>18278763

I hate to break it to you but this parallel between the Trinity and Satcitananda is rejected by contemporaries autorities of Advaita Vedanta.

Because in the christian Trinity there is dependency of the Son to the Father (Source and Origin of the Trinity) and then another dependency of the Spirit (subject to debate between the papist and the orthodox but it doesn't affect our point). God the Father is the model of the son, his Image (and I will not talk about the Spirit to not complicate it). Whereas SatCitAnanda depicts the nature of Brahman in three different way, absolute, not dependent to one another (because it's the same being) and simultaneous.

There is no relations between Sat (Being), Cit (Conciousness) and Ananda (Bliss) because it is the same divine nature. I could as well say that God is blissful because He knows His Being, or that He is conscious of the blissfullness of Being or that He is Conscious of Being pure Bliss.
And the three hypostasis of the Trinity have all the same : Being, Bliss and Consciousness, there is not one that is Being, one that is counciousness and one that is bliss. They are all blissful, conscious and ontologically infinite. In fact, all Bliss,... comes from the Father, but they all have it in participation (pure and thus equal participation).
The mystery of the Trinity is that of participation (from the model to the image and toward the spirit that go down to men.
The mystery of Sat-Cit-Ananda is that of the identity, in God, of the names or manifestations of Goodness.