/lit/ - Literature

>new ChatGPT version is out
>ChatGPT, summarise the chapter on the "anticipations of perception" in the critique of pure reason in about 1000 words
>it proceeds to spout out a text that looks like it's about the book, but is conceptually, exegetically, systematically, and entirely, wrong
I don't understand why this thing is so praised. I had an open mind, but unless i correct it on everything until it parrots me, it never says anything useful. Maybe if we could make it physically eat the book, things would be different.