/lit/ - Literature

what better evidence is there of this man completely BTFO'ing bourgeois political economy than them having to abandon materialism and embrace the unfalsifiability of marginalism?
take a look at the supply/demand curves that the neoclassicals teach to students. these people say that as quantity goes up price also goes up. not down as we'd expect from economics of scale. it is no surprise that neoclassical economics is an incoherent mess

>>19304135
>- no marxist/socialist/communist etc stuff
but how are you going to have a scientific understanding of economics OP? by reading garbage written by neolibs who don't even understand the mode of production they defend?

>>19272370
no that's just a side business. if you can grow it enough then you might enter the petty bourgeois. but remember that the haute (big) bourgeoisie does not trust its petty counterpart, which is why you're better off throwing your hat in with the workers. £100 isn't really enough to make any difference class-wise
t. self-employed petty bourgie who knows full well how precarious my situation is

>>18783559
no US president ever has been anywhere near a commie. the entire US political system loses its fucking mind over even succdem reforms. even Bismarck realized you have to give the proles things like healthcare or they'll revolt

I would suggest the brainlets in this thread actually read Marx before voicing their stupid opinions about his work

>>18651835
>le mudpie argument
literally addressed on page 3 of Capital

>>18651854
>Wage labor isn't exploitation because you need a profit in order to pay wages, and because wages are determined by contracts and competition between producers
contracts and competition don't magically make wage labour not exploitation. we can quantify the rate of exploitation. profit literally can't happen without it

>>18651864
and yet marginalism still can't explain where prices come from

>>18651998
>maybe if I call my interlocutors uneducated NEETs then I'll suddenly be right!
pathetic
also I run my own business. what now, dum-dum?

>>18651949
>Apparently, the reasons why COVID crash happened are the same reasons why the fuck Great Depression happened according to you fucking retards.
it's almost as if capitalism is inherently unstable or something. I wonder if anyone's written any books about this

>>18652080
>Having a higher supply of goods isn't a crisis unless its socialism.
>Imagine being such a fucking retard you think the world is just some static bubble where stability is where, and there's no intrinsic chaos to the world
imagine being this market cucked. porky has taught you well, anon