[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18202667 [View]
File: 156 KB, 960x960, i.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18202667

Welcome To Hell

>> No.18202481 [View]
File: 156 KB, 960x960, i.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18202481

We are primarily animals who want to fuck and this is sexual strategy.

Traditional sexual strategy for women involves those cursed beauty standards which keep feminists up at night. Girly hair and make-up, a charming feminine demeanor, and a sexually alluring body-type; trips to the gym and a reasonably controlled diet. Not foul-language, not cigarette smoking, not beer swilling, nor an ego-obsessed girl bent on proving how cool and smart she is.

When women aren’t aesthetically gifted enough to organically attract the men which they feel entitled to, they attempt to change the parameters by-which men are attracted to women through trickery and sophistry. They redefine attraction and attempt to sell the redefinition. Women assume that since authenticity and identity are important qualities which attract them to men, in the name of universal equality, these things are at the forefront of what will attract a man to a woman- if only she can convince him that bikini-model measurements are embarrassing and unsophisticated.

Sex-positive women, or sexperts, attempt to swing their promiscuous behavior into the realm of intellectual savvy. The difference between a dumb slut and a sex-positive sexpert is defined by the latter; a man should not want the unintelligent, unsophisticated dumb slut. Her promiscuity is inauthentic, she probably has self-esteem problems, or daddy issues; therefore the sex she provides is undesirable. Wait, what?

The increased emphasis on identity is intended to garner committed interest from desirable men, but will ultimately serve to coddle the woman’s ego and feelings- she’ll still have the same sex with attractive men, the same beta-male orbiters, and date men who exist somewhere between the two.

The white knight is the male equivalent of the cool girl, using a meticulously sculpted identity in an attempt to garner sexual interest. The white knight will rightfully understand that authenticity and identity are necessary for what will attract women, and like the cool girl, is conscious of his limitations and so he’ll attempt to redefine the parameters of what women find desirable.

The difference between the cool girl and the white knight is that the white knight has to keep a keener eye toward what he understands as reality while the cool girl could dictate what she wants reality to be. The cool girl can say outright that a high-value male should want an authentic girl with admirable interests, regardless of what actually interests him. She’s able to do this because she’ll always garner the same results regardless- as long as she’s just attractive enough, she’ll receive some degree of sexual attention from desirable men while rationalizing their lack of sustained interest (ie: “he was a jerk”), all while her beta-male orbiters console her (ie: “he was a jerk… but I’m not” [crickets]).

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]