[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19695298 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, FF8DA74E-2EA1-4DD8-939A-6E3DB556BAA0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19695298

Was he a troll?

>> No.18204200 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18204200

How do I get into Hegel?
With which works should I start and with which to end?
I dont know, how hard it is to comprehend his works. Should I start with his lectures, are those easier?
I have the same question about Aristotle

>> No.18161347 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, 46268A99-C894-47D7-A324-16AA995CCEBE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18161347

Good books on ethical vegetarianism?

>> No.18073817 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, Download (3).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18073817

Redpill me on Hegel

>> No.17685178 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17685178

>>17685149
That's what makes him real

>> No.16978266 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, E9B9006F-9FBF-446E-A5A6-290F78D44A17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16978266

Hey /lit/, need some advice

My husband and I are both academics. We've been married for 3 years, and been together for 6. He is an academic philosopher and I am a physicist. He has recently expressed displeasure that I've never seriously engaged with his work. Now, I've read a bit of the classics of philosophy, but my husband's work is more in what I'm told is called the "continental" tradition. Unfortunately, everything he's shown me has just seems completely insane.

Here's the problem: his work apparently involves claims about physics that are just wrong, and wrong in a very embarrassing way! I'll admit, I'm a terrible person, but I had never read his thesis before. I tried reading it and it's riddled with talk about for instance the necessary relationship between matter "extension" and possessing mass. He also talks about the "shape" of fundamental particles. This is obviously nonsensical/wrong; electrons have mass and are point particles (they don't take up space really). In the thesis and some other papers he wrote he seems to think of himself as "scientific" and a "materialist" but his entire idea of what these words mean is stuck in like, outdated 19th century ideas about atoms as little billiard balls flying around in space. I've gently tried to help him and explain how he might start to engage seriously with contemporary physics (he has never read a book on the subject and is by his own admission "bad at math"), but he just gets angry with me and explains that Hegel's system is presuppositional and the basis for all possible rational thought so there is no need at all to read other texts in the first place (I have no idea what this means). He will throw out terms like "speculative propositions" but when I ask him to explain what this means or give me examples he just starts giving me more inscrutable jargon that makes no sense. On top of that, he will repeatedly say German phrases or terms that he uses (and pronounces) incorrectly (I am a native speaker) or nonsensically. He claims to understand the language (he doesn't) and tells me that Hegel can only be understood "in the original German" but he clearly can't read the language and when I've tried to read the original texts they make even less sense.
1/2

>> No.16623149 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, jewgel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16623149

Was he a secret kike all along?

>> No.15090832 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15090832

>>15090342
hey girl!

>> No.14752083 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14752083

This is the final boss, right?

Even very intelligent people struggle with Hegel.

>> No.13795848 [View]
File: 7 KB, 200x253, hegelsportrait.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13795848

sorry man you have to actually point out in the text where i was wrong, haha, this is how debates work, you didnt know that? can't find a contradiction? I guess I win... lol

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]