[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.23403482 [View]
File: 448 KB, 564x780, Simone_de_Beauvoir2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23403482

>>23402170

>> No.22730424 [View]
File: 448 KB, 564x780, Simone_de_Beauvoir2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22730424

Where does one start with Simone de Beauvoir?

>> No.22462836 [View]
File: 448 KB, 564x780, Simone_de_Beauvoir2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22462836

Doing this thread agin since I couldn't reply to the idiots yesterday.
Why does this thing think it that women can be understood? I mean, she doesn't even know what a woman is or what it is becoming.
Is there a more retardedly dogmatic school than exiatentialism?

>> No.22459868 [View]
File: 448 KB, 564x780, Simone_de_Beauvoir2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22459868

Why does she assume it is overall possible to "understand" women? Doesn't she know you can't ever truly understand anyone else since you can never see their perspective? Was she just stupid?

>> No.21261048 [View]
File: 448 KB, 564x780, Simone de Beauvoir.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21261048

Try to refute her /lit/. You can't

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]