/lit/ - Literature

>>20665281
Well you seem to analyse a lot of true things. But i think your theory only hold in such general terms. Not only do you ignore non-western thinking but also you generalize western thinking under different forms of historical forms. Basic hegelian approach. To make it more clear i think you dont pay attention to the actual constitution of the Self throughout history and outside the west. Also you seem to focused on the empirical Self and skip any insight into the nature of consciousness.
I could be wrong. Your approach is definitely interesting.
What exactly do you mean by monism? How have the greeks been monists, the confucians, the judeo-christian tradition and... How to restore monism in this age?