/lit/ - Literature

>>23404458
I can barely believe anyone could write this sloppaganda and actually think they're intelligent and have something to offer others.

>>22784197
Well, read one then.

>>21436381
should I try to use male fantasy isekai tropes?

I guess I could write my female romance erotica for other ideas with a monogamous couple.

i bought the new paperwhite 6.8 recently released. i had an old paperwhite and i must say dark mode with warm light is very comfy.

Are your political beliefs congruent with your philosophical beliefs?
How so, how not so?

>>18307389
i have life altering clarity and wisdom about my life, but only in fleeting spurts that last 20 - 30 minutes.
its so frustrating to watch myself fold back into the same self destructive habits and mannerisms, but i do anyway.
i will never try as hard as i think i should.
i will never work as hard as i think i should.
and i will stay mediocre because of my blatant faults and stresses.

i wait for an epifany that will never fruit.

I'm getting filtered by Lacan. How do I into psychoanalysis bros? Like what is a good Introductory book to psychoanalysis/Lacanian thinking?

>>17993082
Oh, just like me then

>>17873315
No it's trying to prove something about objects in and of themselves. We aren't as humans above them we are equal to them but there is something about them that we can not understand or see. It's In the realm of metaphysics not religion.
>>17873270
From the point of view of the object is a bit of an over simplification. Also Harman explicitly addresses your other point about definitions if you do even a quick Google search you will find some articles about it. I mean fair enough that Harman expects you to have read immateriality and a billion random essays split between journals and art websites etc but still this isn't what he was getting at.
>>17873353
Egocentrism.