/lit/ - Literature

>>18887961
>Until you've identified a demonstrable difference between your awareness and someone else's, then you don't even have a basis for making judgments like that which are presupposing separate conscious parts
>a demonstrable difference between your awareness and someone else's
what you're doing here is basically arguing a kind of solipsism. with this statement you're denying that i have my own conscious experience and you have yours. except it's almost like you're being cheaper than that and denying that i have my own conscious experience at all. this is 1984-tier argumentation. you're not denying a person's experience of their own logic and sight; you go so far as to deny their very own observable consciousness reality itself.
>your consciousness is a lie. what you experience is not true
>you think you're conscious of a person sitting at a computer typing away, but really you're conscious of everything simultaneously.
there is no way you can deny that my conscious experience is different from yours, and therefore demonstrably separated. we already have solipsism which is considered a moot bore because of how there's nothing to really talk about since there's no way to even begin confirmation of it, and yet here you manage to take it a step further.
>you and me as awareness are not both "parts" of Brahman that are conscious of different things
except you and me are clearly both conscious of different things. are you retarded?
>The Atman-Brahman that is already forever liberated is non-dual infinite awareness who has no awareness of maya
and yet i myself have awareness of maya, and so do you. this cannot be denied. that clearly demonstrates that there is consciousness that is 'liberated' (unaware of maya) and consciousness that is not liberated (aware of maya), which indicates differentiation.
>only the beings within maya have their foundational consciousness present itself as sākṣī
see, you even confirmed it here, you absolute nigger.
you paint a picture of a sort of layered egg. you use a different color to explain each different layer of the egg, but then you conclude with "there are no layers and the egg is all just one color".
except here you didn't even get the order right. you started by saying "there are no colors or layers", and then you immediately go on to describe the various colors and layers, you moron.