/lit/ - Literature

>>12633031
That's a different anon, dude. There's more than one person on this board who disagrees with you; big whoop.

>not approving of the shitty contemporary treatment of culture and intellectualism is "cultural marxist nonsense"
It is if you're referring to the contemporary treatment of culture and intellectualism that I'm referring to when I say techno-capitalists. I'm not talking about covert Marxists and liberals who ride on the coattails of capitalists and access society by disparaging it. I'm talking about enterprising capitalists who properly network, work hard, and get shit done, because they're useful and creative; there are still plenty of people like that in the world and they are the people I am talking about, and it is these people who endeavored to create the video game industry and the high culture surrounding it.

>Yes, I'll compulsively ignore the arguments of someone who addresses their readers as "fagots" and spends an entire essay spouting complete nonsense about art history and arguing with strawmen from his head.
Well, you sound like you've made up your mind already, so I guess there's no point in trying to convince you further.