[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14274632 [View]
File: 18 KB, 280x280, 3306337063_a521e95943[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14274632

>pound, eliot, celine, borges, nabokov, schopenhauer, heidegger, etc etc all raving right-wingers/fascists/racists/anti-semites/nazis/monarchists

"Y-you see they were really not right wing... they didn't fit into the left-right dichotomy, they were just products of their time! T-they would be disgusted by people calling them right wingers! Since they did not echo the exact sentiments of right wingers in 2019 verbatim there is NO WAY you can say they were truly right-wing. Men of their intellect surely would not have believed those things in the modern day. B-besides, they weren't really the geniuses people say they were, here's [one mediocre book by an otherwise genius author/poet/philosopher]"

>[writer/philosopher] was vaguely liberal or even an unironic Nazi like Heidegger that contributed to continental philosophy

"Wow. A true genius. This just goes to show that if [writer] were alive today, he would be listening to Chapo and posting on /leftypol/. Any idiosyncrasies from the modern left surely would have been ironed out.

Why are there no good conservative authors? Right wing literature? LOL!!! Conservatives don't read."

Why can't lefties on this board and in literary criticism admit righties can write and stop the apologism and revisionism towards right wing authors?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]