/lit/ - Literature

>>23138855
>>
>Anonymous 03/02/24(Sat)19:43:17 No.23138855▶
> >>23138843
> >any actual critique without the modern leftist buzzword soup?
> I think >>>/r9kpol/ is more your speed.
> >>23138848
> You're clearly misreading the reply and who it was intended to, I said Schopenhauer's opinion on women is wack, but not that his entire philosophy or actual works and essays are. They're not, his essays are a rather illuminating and entertaining read, his views on women were outdated even by the standards of the time he lived in and were needlessly vitriolic, which makes sense given his experience with his mother and how she described him.

>>21503330
>If you had limited room for books and wanted to encourage reading that wasn't brain dead right wing garbage or smut, what books would you pick?