[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18485762 [View]
File: 268 KB, 1800x1707, 1621043346553.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18485762

>>18485674

>> No.17925043 [View]
File: 268 KB, 1800x1707, Eu8IgOXWYAIDtIu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17925043

.

>> No.17634487 [View]
File: 268 KB, 1800x1707, E9796B7C-4DBC-4AE2-8D94-302A217C3D78.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17634487

I’m interested in an aesthetic philosophy which is tamer than Nietzsche’s and when I learned that schopenhauer existed he seemed like a promising lead. But threads on /lit/ show he had a bunch of bad hot takes
>brown people were the original humans
>beards are penises for your face
>love is an illusion
What’s the deal with him and his thought?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]